If you're planning a study that involves human participants at the University of Waikato you need approval from a committee delegated from the University Human Research Ethics Committee.
In the Faculty of Computing and Mathematical Sciences we have such a delegated committee and you should apply for approval of your study via this committee.
This page contains information to support preparation of an application, including University of Waikato regulations, example documents, and a description of procedures to follow.
If you have any questions, please contact one of the FCMS Ethics Committee:
- Dr Lyn Hunt, Room G.2.28, x8338, lah at stats.waikato.ac.nz
- Dr Masood Masoodian, Room G.1.08, x4978, masood at cs.waikato.ac.nz
- Dr Michael Mayo, Room, G.2.20, x4403, mmayo at cs.waikato.ac.nz
University Regulations and Information
The Faculty of Computing and Mathematical Sciences Ethics Committee follows University of Waikato regulations and guidelines:
Ethical Conduct in Human Research and Related Activities Regulations
(updated July 2008)
Requirements for an Application Within FCMSYour application should have these components:
Your application should be clear about how participants give informed consent for their participation in your study. Any proposed incentives for participants should be clearly described and justified; in practice most studies can be performed without explicit incentives.
Please ensure that all paperwork is securely held together or in a folder, and submit it to the Computer Science office (G.1.21). The office will record the date on which applications are received. Applications should only be in printed form, electronic submissions are not acceptable. (If electronic resources are to be used, such as an on-line questionnaire, please provide printed copies as well as the location of the on-line material).
For PhD students moving from Conditional to Full Enrolment you should submit your Research Proposal instead of a Project Details form.
Getting a Response
If possible, the Committee will respond to applications within two working weeks. This turnaround time should not be taken for granted, and a reasonable amount of time should be left between submission of the application and the planned start of the study. Please be aware that the Committee may request further information, or require changes to be made to the experimental procedures and materials before approval can be given. You will receive a written response to your application, giving approval or detailing further steps that are required before the application is resubmitted.
If you study includes aspects which are included on the following Red Flags list you should allow additional time:
Where the research is located in an external location,
such as a school or office, then the application should include explicit agreement to the study by an appropriate person in the organisation, e.g. school principal, office manager etc. We encourage supplying a letter of agreement/support from a school principal (or other similar authority) along with the application.
Scope of Feedback
The Committee is not intended to provide feedback on the quality of the research and experimental methodology that is
described in applications. Any response will focus on the ethical considerations involved in the application.
Pilot studies require ethical approval before they can be carried out. The Committee considers a pilot study to be an investigation into the efficacy of the experimental design, where individuals who have not been involved in designing the experiment are subjected to the experimental procedures and conditions.
Re-application for Approval
If the experimental procedures or materials change at any time after approval has been given, experimentation must stop and a further application must be submitted, describing the changes. The Committee expects and requires that approved applications held on file are an accurate description of the experimentation that took place.
Applications that only generally describe one or more experiments in a series, or integrate multiple experiments such that the procedures and materials for each experiment are not individually distinguishable will not be approved. 'Blanket' approval for a number of loosely-defined experiments on a topic will not be given.
In your application you should be clear about what will happen to any data you collect. You can deposit material in the FCMS Data Archive as a secure form of storage. In your application for approval of your research you can also specify a destruction date for the data.
You can choose to archive data and materials for a specified period (along with a destruction request) or indefinitely.
The Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers (ALPSP) and the International Association of
Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers (STM) have issued a :
Several journals (e.g. The Lancet) include
a guidelines of five years for supporting data. Material based around teaching related activity that has no external audience and does not contribute to research usually does not require to be archived for such periods. Such material could be archived until the completion of the course, plus some time to allow to finalisation of grades (and any appeals).
To deposit material in the FCMS Data Archive:
- Print and complete a Deposit Cover Sheet
- Attach your Cover Sheet to your material
- Submit your material to the FCMS Office (G.G.20)